One or more PFAS compounds exceed EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels. This is not a current violation — the federal compliance deadline is April 2029 (a proposed extension to 2031 is not final). These are UCMR 5 results from 2023 to 2025; the system may have installed treatment since.
Key contaminants vs MCL
PFOA8.3 ppt(MCL: 4 ppt)
PFOS9.7 ppt(MCL: 4 ppt)
EPA MCL: 4 ppt (parts per trillion) for PFOA and PFOS individually. Compliance deadline: April 26, 2029 under the current rule.
See this system's PFAS detection levels
Free — enter your email for full site detail and weekly alerts.
See the exact detection levels — free
Your email unlocks every blurred value on this page instantly. You'll also get email updates when your state's MCLs, settlement deadlines, or funding change.
114 more results for this water system — free with your email
See the exact detection levels — free
Your email unlocks every blurred value on this page instantly. You'll also get email updates when your state's MCLs, settlement deadlines, or funding change.
As printed in the state's own documents. Amounts are not added together: each is a different kind of figure.
Jun 26, 2026 · A PER will be developed to evaluate and compare PFAS treatment technologies using representative source water under controlled conditions. The raw water PFAS compound distribution, TOC, and other parameters that influence treatment performance will be determined followed by bench-scale and pilot- scale testing to simulate full-scale operation of candidate media such as granular activated carbon or ion exchange. Test results are used to assess PFAS removal efficiency, breakthrough behavior, and sensitivity to competing constituents. Findings from the bench/pilot testing will be documented in a PER which summarizes quality conditions, testing methods, analytical results, and a comparative evaluation of treatment alternatives, including life-cycle cost, operational considerations, and residual management. The PER will provide a defensible technical basis for selecting a recommended treatment approach and define next steps. · $738k
On SRF fundable list (Provisional Priority List). Source →
Jun 26, 2026 · A PER will be developed to evaluate and compare PFAS treatment technologies using representative source water under controlled conditions. The raw water PFAS compound distribution, TOC, and other parameters that influence treatment performance will be determined followed by bench-scale and pilot-scale testing to simulate full-scale operation of candidate media such as granular activated carbon or ion exchange. Test results are used to assess PFAS removal efficiency, breakthrough behavior, and sensitivity to competing constituents. Findings from the bench/pilot testing will be documented in a PER which summarizes quality conditions, testing methods, analytical results, and a comparative evaluation of treatment alternatives, including life-cycle cost, operational considerations, and residual management. The PER will provide a defensible technical basis for selecting a recommended treatment approach and define next steps. · $738k